Bonus: Top up now and we'll double your first deposit — get x2 credits instantly.

Kimi K3: Self-Hosting & Deployment Guide

Up to 10%

Call Kimi K3 through LLM.API when you want Moonshot-family text generation with unified auth, provider choice, and production-friendly defaults.

Compare Kimi K3 alternatives (33) →

What is Kimi K3?

On LLM.API, Kimi K3 (kimi-k3) serves as a Moonshot conversational model for products that need 1M tokens context windows and predictable token pricing. It is positioned as a Moonshot offering for production API access.


How to run Kimi K3 yourself

Open weights (other), 2779.9B parameters. Below: how much memory the weights need at each quantization, which hardware fits them, and the commands to serve it.

Kimi K3 VRAM requirements

Precision / quantizationWeightsFigureSource
BF16 (full precision)5559.9 GBEstimate2779.9B params × 2 bytes
FP82819.9 GBFile sizeRedHatAI/Kimi-K3-FP8-BLOCK

File size = actual download size on Hugging Face. Estimate = parameter count × bytes per weight. Weights only — the KV cache for long contexts needs extra memory; the fit tables below add 15% headroom as a rule of thumb.

GPU requirements: deploy Kimi K3 on your hardware

HardwareBF16 (full precision)FP8
NVIDIA H200141 GB——
NVIDIA H10080 GB——
NVIDIA A100 80GB80 GB——
NVIDIA L40S48 GB——

GPUs needed per variant.

HardwareBF16 (full precision)FP8
AWS p5.48xlarge8× H100 · 640 GB——
AWS p4de.24xlarge8× A100 80GB · 640 GB——
AWS g6e.12xlarge4× L40S · 192 GB——
Google Cloud a3-highgpu-8g8× H100 · 640 GB——
Azure ND H100 v58× H100 · 640 GB——

Whole-instance GPU memory; public instance specs.

Serve it yourself

pip install -U vllm
vllm serve moonshotai/Kimi-K3
pip install 'sglang[all]'
python -m sglang.launch_server --model-path moonshotai/Kimi-K3

Commands use the official repositories above; vLLM and SGLang expose an OpenAI-compatible endpoint.

Skip the deploy — use LLM.API as your endpoint

No GPUs, no quantization trade-offs. Same model, OpenAI-compatible, up to 10% below list price.

Providers

LLM.API routes Kimi K3 to the providers below, with discounted effective rates versus list price.

List price by provider

InputOutput
moonshot$3 in
$15 out
canopywave$3 in
$15 out
novita$3 in
$15 out
togetherai$3 in
$15 out
nebius$3 in
$15 out
alibaba$3 in
$15 out
melious$3.25 in
$16 out

Provider list prices; the LLM.API discount applies on top.

ProviderPricingContextCapabilities
moonshotin $3; out $15 per 1M tokens1M tokensvision, tools, streaming, reasoning, web search, JSON, structured
canopywavein $3; out $15 per 1M tokens1M tokensvision, tools, streaming, reasoning, web search, JSON, structured
novita10% offin $3; out $15 per 1M tokens1M tokensvision, tools, streaming, reasoning, JSON, structured
togetheraiin $3; out $15 per 1M tokens1M tokensvision, tools, streaming, reasoning, web search, JSON, structured
nebiusin $3; out $15 per 1M tokens1M tokensvision, tools, streaming, reasoning, web search, JSON, structured
alibaba5% offin $3; out $15 per 1M tokens1M tokensvision, tools, streaming, reasoning, web search, JSON, structured
meliousin $3.25; out $16 per 1M tokens1M tokensvision, tools, streaming, reasoning, web search, JSON, structured

Prices and availability from the LLMAPI catalogue, updated nightly. Last updated 11 Oct 2026.

Try this model

Test Kimi K3 right here — free to start.

Kimi K3
Hi! Want to test the model?

Suggestions for your first prompt

Code snippet

Call Kimi K3 through the OpenAI-compatible API — POST /v1/chat/completions.

Switching from OpenAI? Change 2 lines.

- base_url="https://api.openai.com/v1"
- api_key="YOUR_OPENAI_KEY"
+ base_url="https://api.llmapi.ai/v1"
+ api_key="YOUR_LLMAPI_KEY"

Everything else stays the same — SDK, message format, tools, streaming. Set model to kimi-k3 and the call runs unchanged.

bash
curl https://api.llmapi.ai/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $LLMAPI_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "kimi-k3",
    "messages": [
      {"role": "user", "content": "Give me three crisp launch checklist items."}
    ],
  "reasoning_effort": "max"
  }'
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    api_key="YOUR_LLMAPI_KEY",
    base_url="https://api.llmapi.ai/v1",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="kimi-k3",
    messages=[
        {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise product assistant."},
        {"role": "user", "content": "Give me three crisp launch checklist items."},
    ],
    reasoning_effort="max",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)
import OpenAI from "openai";

const client = new OpenAI({
  apiKey: process.env.LLMAPI_KEY,
  baseURL: "https://api.llmapi.ai/v1",
});

const resp = await client.chat.completions.create({
  model: "kimi-k3",
  messages: [
    { role: "user", content: "Give me three crisp launch checklist items." },
  ],
});

console.log(resp.choices[0].message.content);
stream = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="kimi-k3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Write a haiku about latency."}],
    stream=True,
)

for chunk in stream:
    delta = chunk.choices[0].delta.content
    if delta:
        print(delta, end="", flush=True)
{
  "model": "kimi-k3",
  "messages": [
    {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise product assistant."},
    {"role": "user", "content": "Give me three crisp launch checklist items."}
  ],
  "reasoning_effort": "max"
}

Supported endpoints & features

Base URL https://api.llmapi.ai/v1 · model ID kimi-k3 · OpenAI-compatible.

  • POST /v1/chat/completionsChat Completions — supported
FeatureStatusHow to set it
Function calling (tools)Supportedtools, tool_choice
Parallel tool callsNot supportedparallel_tool_calls
JSON modeSupportedresponse_format: {"type": "json_object"}
Structured outputsSupportedresponse_format: {"type": "json_schema", …}
StreamingSupportedstream: true
Vision (image input)Supportedimage_url content parts
Web searchSupportedweb_search
Reasoning effortmaxreasoning_effort: "max"

Errors & fallback routing

CodeWhat it meansWhat to do
401Missing or invalid API key.Send Authorization: Bearer YOUR_LLMAPI_KEY and check the key is active.
429Rate limited, or the upstream provider is throttling the request.Back off and retry with jitter; the gateway also retries the request on another provider where one is available.
5xxUpstream provider error or timeout.Retry; fallback routing sends the retry to the next healthy provider for this model.

When a provider fails or throttles, the request is routed to the next provider serving this model — the ones listed in the providers table above.

Kimi K3 in production

What the model is good at.

  • Code assistance

    Helps write, explain, refactor, and debug application code across common languages.

  • Multilingual drafting

    Drafts and translates professional content across major business languages. Relevant for `kimi-k3` workloads on LLM.API.

  • Analytical writing

    Produces clear analyses, comparisons, and decision memos from messy source material. Reflects Moonshot positioning for this endpoint.

  • Structured outputs

    Can produce JSON-friendly or schema-oriented responses when prompted carefully. Tuned to how teams typically call Kimi K3.

  • Safety-aware replies

    Supports product policies with refusals and cautious handling of sensitive topics. Grounded in the model's chat role rather than generic chat claims.

What you get when you call Kimi K3 through LLM.API.

  • Unified AI Routing

    Reach Kimi K3 and sibling models through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint.

    One endpoint, every model.
  • Cost Control

    Compare provider price points and keep spend visible as you scale Kimi K3.

    More performance, less spend.
  • Reliability Layer

    Retry and route across configured providers when a single upstream blips.

    Never go dark on users.
  • Observability

    Practical: Trace prompts, tokens, and errors for Kimi K3 alongside the rest of your stack.

    See every token, everywhere.
  • Drop-in SDKs

    Practical: Keep using familiar OpenAI client patterns with base URL https://api.llmapi.ai/v1.

    Think tasks, not models.
  • Model Breadth

    Swap Kimi K3 for chat, media, or embedding alternatives without rewriting auth.

    Scale from 1 to millions.

When to Use — When NOT to Use

Use it if...

  • You need a general-purpose text model for assistants, agents, or content workflows (Kimi K3)
  • You need provider failover options exposed for this model id (Kimi K3)
  • Your prompts benefit from the model's family strengths (reasoning, speed, or cost) (Kimi K3)
  • You want OpenAI-compatible chat completions through a single LLM.API key (Kimi K3)

Avoid if...

  • You need pure embedding, OCR, or media generation instead of chat
  • Your use case depends on unpublished proprietary benchmarks not listed here
  • You need guaranteed real-time hard latency SLAs without benchmarking the provider
  • You require on-prem only deployment with no cloud inference

LLM API rating for Kimi K3

★ 3.7/ 5.0LLM API rating
50% production adoption · 30% category benchmark · 20% tooling & value
✓ Verified benchmark · LMArena + Artificial Analysis
3.5Production adoptionActive open-weight community usage
4.2Benchmark qualityArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index 43.6 · LMArena text rank #23, Elo 1476
3.3Developer ecosystemContext window, tool and JSON support, price against the category median
Reasoning & chat 3.7Coding 3.7Tool & function calling 3.9Long context 3.9
How is this rating calculated?

Every model gets a separate 1.0–5.0 score for each category it can be used in, so a model can rate high for coding and lower for vision. The score combines three parts:

  1. Production adoption — 50%. How widely the model is actually used in production: provider traffic, LiteLLM and gateway usage, open-weight downloads and its LMArena rank. Proven, widely used models score highest.
  2. Category benchmark — 30%. The public benchmark that matters for that category — the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and LMArena Elo for reasoning, LMArena coding Elo for coding, image and document support plus vision Elo for vision, tool and JSON support for function calling, measured speed for voice.
  3. Tooling & value — 20%. Context window, support for tools, structured outputs and streaming, and price compared with the category median.

Scores of 4.0 and above are shown in green, 3.0–3.9 in yellow, below 3.0 in red. When a model has no public data for a part, it gets a neutral value instead of an invented number.

A “Verified benchmark” mark (✓) means an independent lab — LMArena or Artificial Analysis — has actually tested that model, and the source figure is shown. Models without that mark are labelled “Estimated from published specs”: the score comes from the published context window, tool and schema support, price and adoption only, because no independent lab has tested them yet.

One exception: a brand-new top-tier model that scores very high on the independent benchmarks but has no usage history yet is rated on the benchmark (60%) and tooling & value (40%) alone, so a missing adoption figure can't hold it back. All inputs come from public sources and are refreshed weekly.

Adoption and benchmark inputs come from public sources — LMArena, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and published model specs. Updated weekly.

Kimi K3 benchmark scores

Intelligence index

This model44.
Tracked median18.

Scale: 0-100 index points

Output speed

This model39 t/s

Scale: 0-400 tokens per second

Reference price per 1M tokens

Input$3.00
Output$15.00

Bars compare input and output list prices for this model.

Intelligence index+144% vs median
Kimi K3: Self-Hosting & Deployment Guide44
Median tracked model18

Higher is better. The median covers every model tracked by Artificial Analysis.

Output speed
39tok/s

Measured throughput; the full dial is 300 tokens per second.

Reference price / 1M tokens
Input$3.00
Output$15.00

Provider list prices, before the LLM.API discount.

Independent scores published by Artificial Analysis (source). Reference prices are provider list prices, not LLM.API pricing.

What developers say about Kimi models

LMArena#23 · Elo 1476Arena coding#15 · Elo 1509Speed39 tokens/sSources: LMArena, Artificial Analysis

Summarised from publicly published developer and community reviews of this model family. Opinions are the sources’, not LLM.API’s, and may not be specific to Kimi K3.

  • 30-day hands-on reviews describe Kimi K2 as a capable, affordable alternative for coding and agent work.
  • Community round-ups praise the generous free tier and long context, with speed under load the most common complaint.
  • Developers commonly use it as a second opinion model alongside a frontier assistant.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Does Kimi K3 support streaming?

    Yes—at least one listed provider advertises streaming.

  • What is Kimi K3?

    It is positioned as a Moonshot offering for production API access. On LLM.API it is addressed as `kimi-k3`.

  • What is the context length for Kimi K3?

    Reported context for Kimi K3 is 1M tokens. Always verify the active provider row if multiple providers are listed.

  • Which providers serve Kimi K3?

    LLM.API currently lists: alibaba, bitdeer, canopywave, moonshot, nebius, novita, togetherai. Availability can vary by region and account.

  • Where is the canonical page for Kimi K3?

    https://llmapi.ai/models/moonshotai-kimi-k3/

  • Is Kimi K3 a chat model?

    Yes—Kimi K3 is exposed as a chat/completions-style endpoint on LLM.API.

  • When should I choose Kimi K3?

    You want OpenAI-compatible chat completions through a single LLM.API key — especially when you specifically need Kimi K3.

  • What are limitations of Kimi K3?

    Like other API models, Kimi K3 can be wrong, incomplete, or uneven on edge cases. Validate outputs for high-stakes use. Media/OCR/STT models additionally depend on input quality.

  • Can I use tools or structured outputs with Kimi K3?

    Tool and/or structured-output flags appear on one or more providers for this model—confirm in the providers table.

Get one key to every model

Swap your API key. Keep your code.